Share your favorites on Show & Tell
Post an item or

japanese plate

In Asian > Chinese Plates > Show & Tell.
Asian Antiques6873 of 10382asian 11" vaseUnusual Japanese Matte Black Floral and Crane Ginger Jar Vase
6
Love it
0
Like it

auraaura loves this.
racer4fourracer4four loves this.
vetraio50vetraio50 loves this.
surfdub66surfdub66 loves this.
aghcollectaghcollect loves this.
gonzalesrgonzalesr loves this.
See 4 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 9 years ago

    Share

    ijwsail
    (1 item)

    A plate thats been hanging around for a while. 10 inch diameter. Can not identify. vase birds and garden

    Unsolved Mystery

    Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.

    logo
    Chinese Plates
    See all
    SUPERB CHINESE QIANLONG 18thC ANTIQUE BLUE & WHITE PLATE DISH RARE DECORATION
    SUPERB CHINESE QIANLONG 18thC ANTIQ...
    $198
    Chinese Kangxi Period Porcelain Dish Romance of the Western Chamber
    Chinese Kangxi Period Porcelain Dis...
    $90
    Chinese antique charger decorated with antique objects Bo Gu, Guangxu Mark #1332
    Chinese antique charger decorated w...
    $449
    PAIR Antique Chinese Famille Rose Porcelain Bamboo Calligraphy Plate 19th C QING
    PAIR Antique Chinese Famille Rose P...
    $63
    logo
    SUPERB CHINESE QIANLONG 18thC ANTIQUE BLUE & WHITE PLATE DISH RARE DECORATION
    SUPERB CHINESE QIANLONG 18thC ANTIQ...
    $198
    See all

    Comments

    1. vetraio50 vetraio50, 9 years ago
      Not Japanese but Chinese.

      The Mark says Qianlong Nian Zhi - "Qianlong Period, Made".

      But it is not from that period. It is twentieth century.
      Refer to the marks at :
      http://gotheborg.com/marks/20thcenturychina.shtml

      Check out mark 320.

      Very nice though.

    2. ijwsail, 9 years ago
      amazing . thanks.
    3. apostata apostata, 4 years ago
      probably republic period
    4. apostata apostata, 3 years ago
      no it is PROC period from 1960 on

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.