Posted 1 year ago
Alfredo
(349 items)
FOR THOSE OF US WHO COLLECT AND RESEARCH ART DECO SHADES, THE MOST FRUSTRATING PART IS FINDING BASES WITH 3.00" FITTERS WHERE TO DISPLAY THEM.
SO I COUNTED MYSELF LUCKY WHEN I FOUND A BASE WITH A STAR SHADE (PIC. 1--6") , WHICH I REALLY DIDN'T NEED. IT DID NOT MATTER. I WAS AFTER THE BASE (PIC. 4, 12")
MUCH TO MY SURPRISE, WHEN I RECEIVED THE PIECE, I REALIZED THE SHADE WAS SMALLER THAN THE OTHER STARS I HAD (PIC. 2), WHICH MEANT I WOULD KEEP IT. BUT PREVIOUSLY I HAD BOUGHT A 7.5" SHADE IN A SHAPE I HAD NOT FOUND BEFORE. IT HAD "FITTER ISSUES"-- BUT, AS USUAL, I DID NOT MIND.
IT WAS OBVIOUS WHICH SHADE WOULD TAKE OVER THE BASE. BUT NOW I AM SHORT ONE BASE. AND I AM DESPERATELY LOOKING FOR ONE!
I WOULD HAVE USED THE WORD "RUCKL" BUT SINCE I HAVE NO HARD PROOF, I'LL ADD THE WORDS "TENTATIVELY ATTRIBUTED TO".
If These Shirts Could Talk: The Tantalizing Tales Behind Used Clothes
Jockeying for Position: How Boxers and Briefs Got Into Men's Pants
Gloriously Grotesque 19th-Century Pipes
In the Hot Seat: Is Your Antique Windsor a Fake?
Love at First Kite: How Pizza and Pente Led to One Oklahoman's High-Flying Obsession
Blood, Sweat, and Steel: My Afternoon with the Ace of Swords
'The Great Gatsby' Still Gets Flappers Wrong
Say Ahhh: An Oral Surgeon's Quest to Reimagine the Garage-Band Guitar
Forget TV Pickers, Meet the Real Mavericks of the Antiques World
Coveting The Craziest Cat-People Collectibles



