Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Sixth plate daguerreotype of woman with jewelry

In Photographs > Daguerreotypes > Show & Tell and Fine Jewelry > Fine Jewelry Pins and Brooches > Show & Tell.
Photographs1565 of 2897dads secret magazine !!!1940's & 50's Auto Transport Photos
10
Love it
1
Like it

smiatasmiata loves this.
tlmbarantlmbaran likes this.
rniedermanrniederman loves this.
pickingupbonespickingupbones loves this.
AmberRoseAmberRose loves this.
LongingsLongings loves this.
vetraio50vetraio50 loves this.
Agram.mAgram.m loves this.
walksoftlywalksoftly loves this.
officialfuelofficialfuel loves this.
See 9 more
Add to collection

Please create an account, or Log in here

If you don't have an account, create one here.


Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate



Posted 2 years ago

Email

scottvez
(673 items)

This sixth plate daguerreotype dates from the late 1840s to about 1855.

The silver surface makes photography tough-- the light streak in the center is NOT on the actual image.

I found her expression interesting and that along with the jewelry solidified my desire to own it.

She has a large brooch at her neckline. I am not certain but the red may be coral. She has a similar red and gold bracelet on her wrist.

I showed the back of the image as a warning for new collectors. The paper seals are desirable on images-- do not open or remove original seals. Daguerreotype surfaces are very easily scratched and when the seals are removed, there will be some "play" in the image ultimately causing scratches all around the matting edge.

Reproduction of this image in any form is not authorized.

Scott

Comments

  1. scottvez scottvez, 2 years ago
    Thanks eye4beauty-- Thanks for looking and commenting.

    Some of the appearance of large hands is due to the image cant in order to get a viewable image.

    They don't look as large on the actual image.

    Scott
  2. scottvez scottvez, 2 years ago
    It is the size of the image-- these come in standard sizes.

    It is about 3 1/4" X 2 3/4"-- may be off a little, I am going off of memory.

    Scott
  3. scottvez scottvez, 2 years ago
    With all other factors being equal (which is hard with unique photographs), the larger the image, the more desirable and costly.

    Scott
  4. scottvez scottvez, 2 years ago
    Thanks for looking vetraio and longings.

    Scott
  5. scottvez scottvez, 2 years ago
    Thanks amber.

    scott
  6. rniederman rniederman, 2 years ago
    Nice image. Going back to the image size question, 1/6-plate is in reference to a standard known as whole-plate (6.5" x 8.5" format). This was the original size used by Daguerre in 1839 which became a standard measurement. In concept, 6 of these small plates could fit into to a single whole-plate as a 2 x 3 array; hence 1/6th plate.

    Also refer to my Collectors Weekly Show and Tell posting that shows a form of daquerreotype camera that could shoot this type of image: http://www.collectorsweekly.com/stories/9985-palmer-and-longking-daguerreotype-camera?in=user
  7. scottvez scottvez, 2 years ago
    Thanks for looking and commenting rniederman.

    Scott
  8. scottvez scottvez, 2 years ago
    Thanks for looking bones!

    Scott
  9. scottvez scottvez, 2 years ago
    Thanks agram and tlmbaran.

    Scott
  10. scottvez scottvez, 2 years ago
    Thanks vintageloveantiques.

    scott
  11. scottvez scottvez, 2 years ago
    Thanks tlmbaran.

    scott
  12. scottvez scottvez, 12 months ago
    Thanks again for looking smiata!

    scott

Want to post a comment?

Create an account or login in order to post a comment.