Posted 12 months ago
Alfredo
(364 items)
This is one of my favorite Kralik Tango pieces, but only 7.5" tall. I bought it because of both shape and color. And usefulness. In my view, decorative purpose must never take precedence over usefulness (Right, and look at my Loetz!!!!). Any vase going from a bulbous bottom up to a narrow top is useless for flowers. Notice the nicely polished pontil AND the "Czechoslovakia" mark.
I am saving one picture on purpose, for I also have this vase in apple green, 12" tall. I always thought I'd part with it as soon as I found another, same size, in any color but green. Now that I have my glass Ark's "two of a kind", I might keep them together!
Vintage Guru Reveals Her Glamour Secrets
The Killer Mobile Device for Victorian Women
Gloriously Grotesque 19th-Century Pipes
The Beautiful Chaos of Improvisational Quilts
Our Dad, the Water Witch of Wyoming
This 1959 Goggomobil Is Insanely Cute and Gets 55 MPG. Why Can’t Detroit Do That?
California Cool: How the Wetsuit Became the Surfer's Second Skin
The Unfiltered History of Rolling Papers, Plus Tommy Chong's Big Fat Jamaican Vacation
World's Smallest Museum Finds the Wonder in Everyday Objects
Fightin’ Femmes: Unmasking Female Superheroes with Author Mike Madrid



Al; who uses Loetz vases for flowers anyway? But I agree; often designers add "decoration" with no fuctionality, and it tends to become a Victorian nightmare more than a beautiful and useful item. Frilly glass is also fragile, so they (the designers) aren't helping anyone, really. Simple lines with top-notch decoration; a classic formula! Works for me! And yes, they could actually make the item useful for its' intended purpose; that's logical.
I do! I once walked into a florist with a priceless Silberband and asked her to "fill her up". She almost had a heart attack! The point is we treat glass the way we dot even treat people, demanding "market perfection", which not an aesthetic concern at all.