Posted 11 months ago
dasullywon
(47 items)
Here is an example of the "attribution" game. I bought this vase on ebay, and it was sold as "Bohemian Art Glass" which is correct. But if it had been sold as "Loetz Phanomen 377" it might have sold for more. The real question is; am I right? Is this really Loetz 377? I have compared it to the beautiful photographs in "Loetz Austria 1900" (Waltraud Neuwirth) and to the fine examples on Loetz.com and I came to the conclusion that it is Loetz Phanomen Gre-377. It has all the quality and color and the shape is right, so by Dr. Alfredo's method I would say I'm on firm ground here. If anyone has an alternate theory (attribution) I am all ears. This is a simple but elegant piece, and it is also one of my favorites.
The Killer Mobile Device for Victorian Women
If These Shirts Could Talk: The Tantalizing Tales Behind Used Clothes
Gloriously Grotesque 19th-Century Pipes
In the Hot Seat: Is Your Antique Windsor a Fake?
Bizarro Beauty Products, from 1889 to Now
Love at First Kite: How Pizza and Pente Led to One Oklahoman's High-Flying Obsession
Pin-Up Queens: Three Female Artists Who Shaped the American Dream Girl
Say Ahhh: An Oral Surgeon's Quest to Reimagine the Garage-Band Guitar
Tokens for Sweethearts, in Times of War
American Picker Dream, Part I: Mike Wolfe On His Love Affair With Bikes




LOVE THIS AND VERY STUNNING:)
No question about this one! It is definitely a cobalt PG 377. Lovely iridescence.
Thanks for the collaboration, LoetzDance (great name!). I think the iridescence is fab on this one too! I did want someone to confirm my PG 377 identification, so thanks again!
Oh my god... What an attractive piece
Season's Greetings to you and Yours, dasullywon!