Posted 2 years ago
mirek
(1 item)
I found it in the attic in Pembroke, Ontario. There was a phothgrapher living years before us. I have some other lenses but this is brass and large. The others are smaller and often wooden.
If These Shirts Could Talk: The Tantalizing Tales Behind Used Clothes
The mysterious packages kept arriving, some from eBay, others from the Home …
Jockeying for Position: How Boxers and Briefs Got Into Men's Pants
Just as underclothes are shielded from public view, the evolution of men's most intimate apparel is shrouded in secrecy. But the story of men's underwear is about more …
Gloriously Grotesque 19th-Century Pipes
The meerschaum pipes carved in Eastern Europe at the end of the 19th century are among the most bizarre and improbable concoctions in decorative art. Some feature …
In the Hot Seat: Is Your Antique Windsor a Fake?
While researching her book, "Killer Stuff and Tons of Money," Maureen Stanton came across all sorts of characters. For years, she shadowed her antiques-dealer friend …
Love at First Kite: How Pizza and Pente Led to One Oklahoman's High-Flying Obsession
Vintage kites from all over the world hang from the ceiling and walls of Richard Dermer’s popula…
Blood, Sweat, and Steel: My Afternoon with the Ace of Swords
“When I got this sword, it was completely covered in blood rust.” Sword maker Francis Boyd is showing me yet another weapon pulled from yet another …
'The Great Gatsby' Still Gets Flappers Wrong
Have you heard? There’s a new swell in town named Gatsby, and he’s bringing flapper flair back into fashion. Baz Luhrmann’s latest cinematic spectacle—his take on “Th…
Say Ahhh: An Oral Surgeon's Quest to Reimagine the Garage-Band Guitar
It’s not unusual for men of a certain age to have a soft spot in their hearts for the look of vintage guitars and the sound…
Forget TV Pickers, Meet the Real Mavericks of the Antiques World
Long before Mike Wolfe and Frank Fritz swaggered into the spotlight with "American Pickers," writer Maureen Stanton …
Coveting The Craziest Cat-People Collectibles
The memes are endless—Grumpy Cat, Nyan Cat, Keyboard Cat, Maru, and all the Lolcats. Last year even witnessed the first ever Internet Cat Video Fe…
Baush and Lomb lens (No.3 Universal Portrait series A. | Recent comments11759 of 50860 |
Posted 2 years ago
mirek
(1 item)
I found it in the attic in Pembroke, Ontario. There was a phothgrapher living years before us. I have some other lenses but this is brass and large. The others are smaller and often wooden.
Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.
Create an account or login in order to post a comment.
It would be helpful to know what it says on the side of the lens...
Can we get info on lens plus another pic of other side. Dave
I also have one. There is no writing on the other side of it. Mine just states:
No 3
Universal Portrait
Bausch & Lomb Opitcal.
Am I missing something? Does anyone know where I can get information on it?
Thanks
ron
Now I am thoroughly confused! This is now the second lens I've seen that is virtually identical to my Eastman Kodak Portrait lens, f5, 15", 8X10 format. The other lens look-alike is a Burke & James 8X10 Cephaloscope Portrait lens which was supposedly made for the 1916 B&J Ingento Studio Camera, also an f5, 8X10, probably 15" lens. I have read on other photo sites that Kodak not only manufactured some lenses for its own cameras, but as well had licensing agreements with other major optical photo lens manufacturers to produce lenses for them using that manufacturers name on the lenses they purchased for their own Kodak branded cameras. Now I would like to know if my Eastman Kodak Portrait Lens was actually made by Kodak or one of these other possible manufacturers for Kodak, but using Kodak name inscribed on the lens.
My Kodak lens came on The Century Master Studio Camera, Graflex Vintage, 1946-1955 that I purchased about 35 years ago from another photographer who actually purchased it new. I don't know if he already owned the lens, or he purchased it with the camera. I'm thinking the former since this lens is a dead ringer for the B&J Cephaloscope made in 1916, and also the B&L No. 3, made I don't know when. If no one can help us solve this riddle soon I will probably contact the George Eastman House Museum for help. If you can't get it directly from the horse's mouth I don't know where else to go for information on these lenses, the Kodak Portrait Lens in particular. If anyone out there in cyberspace hears our pleas and knows the answers to this riddle a response would be appreciated by all interested photo enthusiast concerning these three lenses.