Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Strömbergshyttan Smoke-grey, 1959-63.

In Art Glass > Scandinavian Art Glass > Show & Tell.
_._STRÖMBERGSHYTTAN29 of 87Gunnar Nylund Stromberg Blue Cumulus Vase ?Gunnar Nylund ametyst/burgundy vases - Strömbergshyttan 1956-57.
25
Love it
0
Like it

iggyiggy loves this.
charmsomeonecharmsomeone loves this.
courtenayantiquescourtenayantiques loves this.
RadegunderRadegunder loves this.
DeanoDeano loves this.
ElisabethanElisabethan loves this.
racer4fourracer4four loves this.
bobogalbobogal loves this.
ThefinderThefinder loves this.
Slave-to-glassSlave-to-glass loves this.
glassartglassart loves this.
austrohungaroaustrohungaro loves this.
freiheitfreiheit loves this.
charcoalcharcoal loves this.
ozmartyozmarty loves this.
DrFluffyDrFluffy loves this.
AimathenaAimathena loves this.
AmberRoseAmberRose loves this.
vetraio50vetraio50 loves this.
ManikinManikin loves this.
valentino97valentino97 loves this.
SEAN68SEAN68 loves this.
Moonstonelover21Moonstonelover21 loves this.
See 23 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 8 years ago

    rebessin
    (114 items)

    If one compares the Swedish and Scandinavian glass with contemporary glass from other parts of the world, I feel that it stands out quite clearly . The shapes are cleaner, more innovative and modern than glass from other countries. One can see that in Sweden we really focused on the involvement of educated and forward-thinking artists in production, more than anywhere else. Beautiful everyday products and glass that ordinary people could afford to buy was also a concept that came and dominated the glass industry throughout the 1900s. But I myself find they forgot this a little bit away from the 1980s onwards , and perhaps this is one of the reasons why we have very little of our once so successful glass industry left?

    When artists of the early and middle part of the century saw the design of everyday glass as the most important , I believe that during the later part of the 1900s (1980s an forwards), we little forgot about this and instead saw the pure art glass as the main task? Everyday glass (the glass we would live on ) came to be "a necessary evil", and the design was developed not in the same way as it had done until then. At Strömbergshyttan I think , however, the stagnation in design started a little earlier, in the mid 1960s , when they settled down and did not take up nearly as much new models as in the 1950s. And Strömbergshyttan was not to be experimented much with pure art glass either, it still belonged to the exceptions. Simply believed that they could live on existing models as it seems. This laid the basis for the 1970s problems as I see it . Then when the machinemade tableware glass became popular around the same time , it was too much for many of the Swedish glassworks . Several of them went to the grave , among others Strömbergshyttan .

    The models you see here (B936, B894 and B982) were released in Strömbergshyttans "good days" round 1959 - 1963. Artist of design is a bit uncertain. Gunnar Nylund , best known for his pottery on Rörstrand, worked for Strömbergshyttan 1952-1956 and as a freelance between 1967 - 1975. He drew lots of glass models for Strömbergshyttan during his first period 1952-56. Probably so many that they could not launch all over his lease time, but several came in the following years 1958-60. But Asta Stromberg , wife of Managing engineering Erik Strömberg, also started to draw a lot of glass (she drew some even before Nylund was contracted) at the end of the 1950s onwards. So who is behind these three models is a bit iffy. The glass at Strömbergshyttan signed usually only with "Strömbergshyttan" and the model number. Designers were reported rarely. And when the drawings for a lot of glass are not (or not yet been found ), we can now only guess who was behind many of the models, among others these. Asta Stromberg was also inspired by Nylund's modern lines and I know (from saved documents that I found) that some of his glass was taken as the basis and was renewed between the years 1957-66.

    It is clear, however, that it is one of the two who designed these vases, possibly it may be a question of basic models of Gunnar Nylund, renewed by Asta Stromberg? Personally, I am quite sure that at least the high vase (B936) was designed by Asta Strömberg. The reason is obvious similarities in design with the so-called Sputnik vases (model B895) , which I know were designed by Asta Stromberg, inspired by rockets shot up the Russian Sputnik satellites in 1957. Also B982 I think is a design by Asta. It's to late to be one of the late released Nylund models, drawn 1956 or earlier (but that's my own specualtion). B894 from 1959 can be a late released Nylund model or a Nylund model (B679 from 1955-56), slightly renewed by Asta Stromberg. Se my blogs here:
    http://glasbloggen.blogspot.se/2013/07/gb25strombergshyttan-b894.html
    http://glasbloggen.blogspot.se/2013/06/gb21b-679-en-intressant-modell-av.html

    If you look at the smoky hue, called "Smoke -gray " and named X76, it differs a little between the vases. It depends on variations in the manual production and that one can get different hue depending on the color ball is in relation to the clear glass caught an over, and how much glass have been blown up.

    The models are clean and stylish shapes that are typical of Strömbergshyttans the 1950 's and 60's glass . They differ a lot from the glass Gerda Strömberg (mother in law to Asta Stromberg) designed between 1933 and the end of the 1940s for Strombergshyttan. I think Gunnar Nylund meant pretty much for Strömbergshyttans successes over the years. His forms shines through much of the production , including the glass Asta Stromberg drew.

    logo
    Scandinavian Art Glass
    See all
    Vintage Sweden Signed Orrefors Etched Art Glass Vase Woman Feeding Birds
    Vintage Sweden Signed Orrefors Etch...
    $28
    Oiva Toikka Nuutajavvi Glass Bird Flycatcher Sieppo Blue. Iittala Finland  A/F
    Oiva Toikka Nuutajavvi Glass Bird F...
    $100
    VINTAGE Erik Hoglundsigned Pukeberg Glassworks Man Woman Sculptures, c. 1980
    VINTAGE Erik Hoglundsigned Pukeberg...
    $245
    Swedish Art Glass Tortoise Paperweight Decorative Ornament By Josef Marcolin
    Swedish Art Glass Tortoise Paperwei...
    $16
    logo
    Vintage Sweden Signed Orrefors Etched Art Glass Vase Woman Feeding Birds
    Vintage Sweden Signed Orrefors Etch...
    $28
    See all

    Comments

    1. SEAN68 SEAN68, 8 years ago
      stunning !!! :)
    2. rebessin rebessin, 8 years ago
      Thanks Sean and Moonstone!
    3. SEAN68 SEAN68, 8 years ago
      your very welcome rebessin!
    4. valentino97 valentino97, 8 years ago
      Great research too - just beautiful!
    5. rebessin rebessin, 8 years ago
      Thanks valentino!
    6. Aimathena Aimathena, 8 years ago
      These have Sean written all over them =^)
    7. rebessin rebessin, 8 years ago
      Very nice, Aimathena! And thanks petey, ozmarty, DrFluffy, AmberRose, vetraio and Manikin!
    8. charcoal charcoal, 8 years ago
      Awesome information rebessin! As usual!!!
    9. austrohungaro austrohungaro, 8 years ago
      I love these grey vases! Specially the one with the triangle shaped mouth.

      I sort of agree with what you say at the begining. I see a lack of attention to utilitarian design and too much of it to art glass that I personally don't see that great. When I think of the "mainstream" Swedish glass in the last years (Orrefors and Kosta Boda) I see excellent craftmanship, but in terms of design I think that they sort of lost their point. When I started being interested in glass -mid 90s- all I can remember from Kosta Boda is pretty awful, except some designs by Sahlin and maybe Ehrner, and much of Vallien's, and the bad thing here is that i don't see it as very artistic glass... I remember some terrible African looking patterns in brown and black, and as for Ulrika Hydman, i find that hermixing glass and painting all in one doesn't quite work. Even some of Wärff's work isn't that appealing to me, and he's one of the big ones. As for Orrefors, it became terribly boring except for Ingegerd Råman 's work. I also find their last collections (Lagerfeld's and Jungnelius', pretty unfortunate). At the same time, if i think of Finnish "mainstream glass", Iittala, I see the attention they paid to both art glass but specially to everyday use glass, and it still seems to be a strong company, even if the crisis has also affected them.

      Mmmm... maybe all I am saying is nonsense as I cannot look at the situation the same way you do.
    10. rebessin rebessin, 8 years ago
      Thanks austro, charcoal an new lovers! Yes austro, I agree with most of what you write. Some modern glass models has "terrible" design. The designers hasa often made great art glass, but not very good everyday glassware as I see.
    11. austrohungaro austrohungaro, 8 years ago
      Well... if we look at the "begining of design", with Art Nouveau and Jugendstil and so on, most of the great names there were trained as painters: Van de Velde, Koloman Moser, Peter Behrens... And so were Per Lütken and Bengt Orup, and no one can deny they designed excellent utilitarian glass.
    12. glassart glassart, 8 years ago
      Great glass, in fact, I purchased a B982 off the internet only last week. If you think you had a problem in Scandinavia from the 1970s onwards, then spare a thought for the mostly tragic glass produced in Britain. Whitefriars made some Scandinavian inspired pieces but in general glass design was dull and old fashioned.

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.