Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Clarus MS-35 Camera. 1946 - 52

In Cameras > 35mm Cameras > Show & Tell.
Vintage & Classic Cameras19 of 115Unknown American Field Camera. c.1890sThe P.D.Q Detective Camera (E. & H.T. Anthony), 1890-91
15
Love it
1
Like it

SEAN68SEAN68 loves this.
f64imagerf64imager loves this.
kyratangokyratango loves this.
officialfuelofficialfuel loves this.
PostCardCollectorPostCardCollector loves this.
JImamJImam loves this.
Rick55Rick55 loves this.
ManikinManikin loves this.
walksoftlywalksoftly loves this.
valentino97valentino97 loves this.
beyemveybeyemvey loves this.
GeodeJemGeodeJem likes this.
CaperkidCaperkid loves this.
fortapachefortapache loves this.
vetraio50vetraio50 loves this.
See 14 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 3 years ago

    rniederman
    (307 items)

    What the ... a camera that isn’t wood and brass in my collection? While the absolute core of my collection is really early gear, a couple special interest cameras slip in occasionally and the Clarus MS-35 is one of them. One reason is that the company was based in Minneapolis, MN. (Yep ... I live in the area.) It also represents an interesting time when American 35mm products simply didn’t compete with their overseas counterparts but attempts were made. Even though the Kodak juggernaut was in full force along with some other companies, there appeared to be a lack of precision American made 35mm equipment.

    I acquired the Clarus a couple decades ago with its original, albeit weird, flash gun and box, and had forgotten about it until collector/historian Ken Metcalf, Graflex specialist and expert, contacted me after reviewing an article for his society’s publication. He mentioned the camera had a Minneapolis connection and asked if I knew about it. “Yes. A nice example is in my collection” was my reply. Ken was somewhat surprised with my confession: “I was surprised to learn that you had the Clarus, especially as I could not find any brass or wood on the camera.”

    Collecting is fun in so many unexpected ways!

    Lots of Clarus information is online and a new article looking deep into the camera’s features and legacy will be published early next year (2017). In a nutshell, the MS-35 was introduced in 1946 and lasted until about 1952. In 1947, advertised pricing was $122.75 with case. Adjusted for inflation, that’s about $1,505 in 2015 dollars. Although somewhat expensive, it was roughly one-half the cost of the [then] current Leica model. The MS-35 is a solid (chunky) camera made of die cast steel instead of stamped metal. On paper it had decent features and specifications; robust build, focal plane shutter, interchangeable coated lenses, long-base for a coupled rangefinder, etc. Over the years, it went through several design changes. Unfortunately, early versions had shutter problems which persisted long enough to ruin the camera’s reputation.

    As a collectable, the MS-35 is somewhat common and early examples are typically found with mechanical problems. Aside from having a working shutter, my later post-1948 example is interesting because it was acquired with its original bottom mounted flash gun. The setup looks awkward yet in-hand the balance is somewhat good if you tolerate the in-your-face sync cord. A bracket was also available to mount the flash on the camera’s top accessory shoe.

    Regardless, some questions I often ask when adding cameras to my collection include “why was it made”? What is it about the camera - its value proposition - that is supposed to resonate with buyers? Who would use it? Etc. Clarus’ 1947 instruction book’s forward states:

    “Here’s something really new in American cameras. A precision built 35mm camera that will never miss the picture.”

    That statement seems a bit odd; suggesting that American 35mm cameras were either not very good or non-existent. Using Clarus’ marketing comment as a starting point, my first thought was: How was it that Germany (and later Japan) had better reputations for 35mm cameras than the United States? ... and more questions ... Why was Clarus trying to compare itself to Leica in some of their advertising? If this was the case, how were these companies, in unstable German and Japanese economies, able to produce highly regarded 35mm cameras?

    Taking into consideration Germany’s and Japan’s post-WW2 economic stabilization efforts by American Joseph Dodge, these country’s inroads to successfully marketing precision 35mm apparatus in the U.S., and some MS-35 advertising, it could be that the Clarus Camera Manufacturing Co. was a startup with a market proposition of bringing American quality to 35mm apparatus by making a camera comparable to Leica but less expensive.

    In other words, at the time of Clarus’ MS-35 (and other American attempts at quality 35mm cameras such as Kodak’s Ektra and Graflex’s offerings), German and Japanese 35mm equipment were already on their way to dominating the American 35mm market. What’s interesting is the acceptance of German and Japanese 35mm cameras was decades ahead of their other mainstream products (i.e. cars, electronics, etc. ) which would eventually lead U.S. markets.

    It appears the transition to non-American 35mm cameras accelerated during the WW2 years. For example, late 1930s to mid-1940s photojournalists already discovered precision, miniature 35mm cameras from Germany and Japan; and word was spreading about the quality, reliability, and optical sharpness of Leica, Nikon, and Contax cameras. When the renowned Magnum Photo Agency was founded in 1947 shortly after WW2 ended, two of its four founders, Robert Capa and Henri Cartier-Bresson, exclusively relied on Contax and Leica cameras. Additionally, throngs of military personnel, in their teens and twenty-somethings, would be returning home having seen, used and sometimes purchased these 35mm marvels; representing a new generation of consumers ready to influence the direction of future photographic equipment purchases and designs.

    Even while growing up with inexpensive cameras (Brownies and so forth) and finally buying my first 35mm in the 1960s; there was an ever-present desire of eventually owning a professional grade camera made by Leica, Contax, or Nikon. Granted, there were other companies but their products didn’t have proven field experience and the strength of pro photographers’ word-of-mouth acknowledgments. And at the time, there didn’t appear to be any comparable American equipment.

    Nonetheless, the Clarus is a professed ‘guilty pleasure’ and curiosity. And while it dates to the late 1940s, I see it as a ‘new’ camera hanging out with my early wood and brass collection.

    logo
    35mm Cameras
    See all
    Nimslo 3D Quadra Lens 35mm Camera W/ Batteries & Box, Tested (Fair)
    Nimslo 3D Quadra Lens 35mm Camera W...
    $200
    LEICA II D Kriegsmarine German Camera Vintage Camera (fed copy) Great Gift
    LEICA II D Kriegsmarine German Came...
    $179
    Nimslo 3D Quadra Lens 35mm Camera, Batteries, Box Tested ELNC
    Nimslo 3D Quadra Lens 35mm Camera, ...
    $300
    CANON AE-1 Light Seal Kit
    CANON AE-1 Light Seal Kit...
    $12
    logo
    Nimslo 3D Quadra Lens 35mm Camera W/ Batteries & Box, Tested (Fair)
    Nimslo 3D Quadra Lens 35mm Camera W...
    $200
    See all

    Comments

    1. rniederman rniederman, 3 years ago
      Thanks, Oroyoroyisthatyourhorse!
    2. racer4four racer4four, 3 years ago
      Really interesting Rob. Thanks.
    3. rniederman rniederman, 3 years ago
      Thanks, racer4fhour and vetraio50!
    4. rniederman rniederman, 3 years ago
      Thanks, fortapache!
    5. rniederman rniederman, 3 years ago
      Thanks, bijoucaillouvintage!
    6. JohnKratz JohnKratz, 3 years ago
      Nice one! Of course, when I think of American competition for the high-end overseas cameras, the first thing that comes to mind is the Mercury. And for only $25! Too bad that when it was introduced, Universal still clung to the proprietary film idea. By the time they revamped it for 35mm, the quality had diminished. That rotary shutter was crazy-accurate though!
    7. rniederman rniederman, 3 years ago
      Thanks, John ... interesting comment.
    8. rniederman rniederman, 3 years ago
      Thanks, Caperkid!
    9. rniederman rniederman, 3 years ago
      Thanks, GeodeJem!
    10. rniederman rniederman, 3 years ago
      Thanks, beyemvey!
    11. rniederman rniederman, 3 years ago
      Thanks!
      Manikin
      David
      valentino97
    12. rniederman rniederman, 3 years ago
      Thanks!
      PostCardCollector
      JImam
      Rick55
    13. rniederman rniederman, 3 years ago
      Thanks!
      Sean
      brunswick
      kyratango
      Michael
    14. SEAN68 SEAN68, 3 years ago
      your very welcome Rob!!

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.