Large Bulbous Vase Qianlong Mark, but appears new | ||
| Radegunder's loves200 of 8280 |  |  |
vcal loves this.
AdeleC loves this.
Blammoammo loves this.
Radegunder loves this.
vetraio50 loves this.
Manikin loves this.
fortapache loves this.
dav2no1 loves this.
jscott0363 loves this.
aura loves this.Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate
Posted 3 years ago
ho2cultcha
(5042 items)
The painting is fabulous i think, but there seems to be no wear on the piece. I'd love to hear from apostata on this one.
Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.
Create an account or login in order to post a comment.
well there no accounting for taste , but i am not so fond of this, the mark is almost monocolored consistent, in the Long symbol the mid section under the key is not closed and in the middle symbol up row lets say qian mark (fish hook) there is no division also caused by blurring , i i think these are bad signs
the scene is ok but is out of balance , the birds are technically out of balance ( size and shape and the overall balance is not completely my taste , because the color of the branches the scene and that ought not to be the intention
i think this is quite a new vase , i don,t know precisely , its Proc i think , and i think it is not even early Proc but very late
correction the dark almost monocolered branches are dominating the scene
could this be japanese?
well i think that is too far fetched , because a real japanese blue will do more then a late chinese Proc , so why fake it the chinese way