Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Unknown Vase

In Art Glass > Show & Tell.
Art Glass5395 of 9578STAR decanter (1703) and matching glasses (1014), Tamara Aladin (Riihimáki lasi, 1963)Rene Lalique - Coloured pintrays #2
6
Love it
1
Like it

miKKoChristmas11miKKoChristmas11 loves this.
scottvezscottvez likes this.
Moonstonelover21Moonstonelover21 loves this.
debbiepike54debbiepike54 loves this.
vetraio50vetraio50 loves this.
GreatsnowyowlGreatsnowyowl loves this.
czechmanczechman loves this.
See 5 more
Add to collection

Please create an account, or Log in here

If you don't have an account, create one here.


Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate



Posted 1 year ago

Email

Nootch
(38 items)

Hello all: Please view a few additional pictures of this vase that I listed about 2 hours ago. I hope these pictures are clearer. Thanks for the comments. Regards

Mystery Solved

Comments

  1. czechman czechman, 1 year ago
    i really think this is a Kralik piece.. i know ive seen this exact shape a "pair" but with a bambus decor complete with thorns!
  2. Greatsnowyowl Greatsnowyowl, 1 year ago
    I'm pretty sure I've seen this shape with modern stickers on it from Poland :) I'll keep my eyes open for another.
  3. czechman czechman, 1 year ago
    your prob right alisa lmbo!.. ive been searching for the pair i think matches this shape.. but cant find it or remember where... maybe i should become a pic hoarder :)
  4. Greatsnowyowl Greatsnowyowl, 1 year ago
    I keep meaning to start hoarding pics. I even started a picasa account to try and help with that. I always forget.
  5. Alfredo Alfredo, 1 year ago
    Ketterer catalog, 1979, the uber auction that was cancelled entirely so that Ricke could buy the whole lot. A pair of these was already there.
  6. Alfredo Alfredo, 1 year ago
    Sorry. Attributed to Kralik.
  7. czechman czechman, 1 year ago
    i knew it!!..thanks Alfredo for confirming :)
  8. Nootch Nootch, 1 year ago
    Greetings: Mucho thanks to czechman and Alfredo for confirming Kralik as the maker of this vase. Alfredo - your indepth knowledge (ref: Ketterer Catalog / 1979) is amazing. Would you be, per chance, a retired prof from NY? Regards, Nootch
  9. Nootch Nootch, 1 year ago
    Greetings all: Guess what! Please refer to current Ebay item 190544718882, listed from Austria. Mine is 10" tall vs the listed pair at 6.6" tall. Thanks again. Regards.
  10. Greatsnowyowl Greatsnowyowl, 1 year ago
    I remain unconvinced. None of those references are at all confirmed by anything solid. An auction house and someone in an Ebay listing? Just because Ricke bought the whole collection, which included one of these does not mean that everything in the collection was old. Collections come with good and bad.
    I am pretty sure I've seen these with tags in this shape and decor and to me the Pontil scar definitely looks like a new snap off scar on the one pictured here (although that could be an optical illusion).

    I've been odd man out before, against the tide as it were, and that's ok. :) Maybe there is a better reason to think these are Kralik that has been forgotten or not shown.. My role here is to offer a counter point without that evidence having been offered. :)

    With that I am going to bow out of this conversation unless I find that proof to support my assertions. It may be awhile ;)
  11. czechman czechman, 1 year ago
    alisa...have a look at these!

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/TWO-BOHEMIAN-ART-NOUVEAU-VASES-KRALIK-CA-1910-TOP-/190544718882?_trksid=p5197.m1992&_trkparms=aid%3D111000%26algo%3DREC.CURRENT%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D14%26meid%3D5432661278000992440%26pid%3D100015%26prg%3D1006%26rk%3D1%26sd%3D190544718882%26
  12. ozmarty ozmarty, 1 year ago
    I pose this questing to to pundits out there .
    Did Kralik make such thick heavey glass vases ?
  13. Greatsnowyowl Greatsnowyowl, 1 year ago
    Kyle, yup.. an ebay *Dealer* has decided to call it Kralik.. does that make it fact?

    nuh huh.

    Just like auction catalogs are for the most part to be distrusted as a legitimate source.

    Their job is to sell things to people.

  14. Greatsnowyowl Greatsnowyowl, 1 year ago
    I am sorry I meant Gary not Kyle.
  15. czechman czechman, 1 year ago
    yes CURRENTLY, one ebay dealer is selling a pair as Kralik.. but i have seen these on auction before WITH provenance marks.. which means these were produced in the late 20's thru the 30's i admit i have not seen that many of them "rare".. the first thing Alfredo said when i showed him the pic of this piece in question was, I have wanted one of those for years!,, now i realize that doesnt proove anything.. but to me it means he has seen these before attributed to kralik.. i as well have seen these sold as Kralik a few times in 20 yrs.. im not here to fight with anyone :)... also wanted to add the current listing of the two like this one has 4 or more offers... HELLO!.. anyway everyone is definately entitled to their own opinion.. fine and dandy this vase is Kralik.. my final say... for now ;)
  16. czechman czechman, 1 year ago
    and the pontl remarks, not all pontl marks are perfect! im positive i have Kralik pieces with a not so nice looking Pontl
  17. Greatsnowyowl Greatsnowyowl, 1 year ago
    different pontil rods leave different kinds of marks or scars. The modern type leave a very clean ring like this has. The broken pontil scars from way back leave a different looking scar.

    They only started using the kind of rod that caused these marks in the 60's or so.

Want to post a comment?

Create an account or login in order to post a comment.