Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Modernist handblown mystery glass vase looks like Art Glass Whirlpool Vase by Robert Fritz

In Art Glass > Show & Tell.
Art Glass18768 of 21626Czech? Gorgeous Egg Shell thin tinted & Enamelled glass Cup & SaucersMystery modernist crystal vase
5
Love it
0
Like it

auraaura loves this.
MALKEYMALKEY loves this.
globoglobo loves this.
AmberRoseAmberRose loves this.
vetraio50vetraio50 loves this.
See 3 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 9 years ago

    KatyaP
    (16 items)

    I need some serious help with this fascinating piece of glass. Unsigned but stunning, it is really driving me mad!

    The closest example I have been able to find is Whirlpool Vase by Robert Fritz which goes for $$$

    Is this one of his piece or not?

    Heeelp!

    Unsolved Mystery

    Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.

    logo
    Art Glass
    See all
    1931 Mid Century Modern MCM Blenko Amethyst Wayne Husted Decanter, Glass Stopper
    1931 Mid Century Modern MCM Blenko ...
    $203
    Antique circa-1900 Hand Blown Polished Pontil Czech Loetz Art Glass, Bronze Vase
    Antique circa-1900 Hand Blown Polis...
    $132
    SUPERB LARGE c1900 LOETZ RED PHAENOMEN IRIDESCENT ART GLASS GILT BRONZE VASE
    SUPERB LARGE c1900 LOETZ RED PHAENO...
    $495
    FINE c1900 SIGNED LOETZ AUSTRIA DIASPORA CRETE PINCHED IRIDESCENT ART GLASS VASE
    FINE c1900 SIGNED LOETZ AUSTRIA DIA...
    $59
    logo
    1931 Mid Century Modern MCM Blenko Amethyst Wayne Husted Decanter, Glass Stopper
    1931 Mid Century Modern MCM Blenko ...
    $203
    See all

    Comments

    1. KatyaP KatyaP, 9 years ago
      Thank you Rob, it is precisely what I was thinking although I have not seen the example you quoted above. I studied the vase but just do not see any signatures which is a bummer!
    2. vetraio50 vetraio50, 9 years ago
      I agree that it's a stunning piece of glass. I prefer the view in photo 3. It is amber as in the fourth photo? Love the pierced section that sets up the internal bubble. Nice!
    3. KatyaP KatyaP, 9 years ago
      yes, its a beautiful smoky amber like colour. I was fascinated by it so I had to buy it!
    4. vetraio50 vetraio50, 7 years ago
      *°·`*~~ SEASON'S GREETINGS - KATYA!~~*`.°*
    5. globo globo, 10 months ago
      Gosh, somehow I acquired six glass works by Robert C. Fritz in recent years, and I can say this piece has two characteristics to support the hand of Fritz, and—sorry— another two discouraging that idea.
      It is 1) typically biomorphic, like every decent kidney-shaped pool or coffee table of Fritz’ era, but with the idiomatic, sometimes bio-implausible lines that Fritz liked; and 2) it is possessed of those attenuated glass “bridges” vaulting from one interior wall to another, a wonderful conceit that I once heard described by Fritz (through a colleague’s remembrance) as “ligaments” of the glass’ visual architecture. That’s a very Modernist element, but freshly refined by Fritz. Ligamental evocations are not his utterly original idea, since they already enriched 20th-century graphic design, three-dimensional craft and sculptural media, and architectural esthetics like Louis Sullivan’s appointments and the iconic whiplash tendrils of Art Nouveau. Even some contemporary composers, like Thomas Ades, discuss the ligaments, viscera and sclerotic arteries in their music (listen to Ades’ “Albion“ for an homage to the ecstasy of scepter’d isle agony).
      On the less confirmatory side, 1) Fritz seems rarely to have worked in clear or colorless glass like this piece, and 2) it seems uncharacteristic of him to leave a finished piece unsigned.
      I believe he was proud of nurturing the glass program at San Jose State University from infancy, as it was one of the first three or four such academic institutions in the U.S. to grant such cultural authority to art glass. And Fritz had every reason to be proud—of both his teaching theory and his art glass—having studied with the pioneers Harvey Littleton and Dominick Labado in Corning, NY, and Toledo, OH, (respectively, I think). Why wouldn’t he sign a work he endorsed?
      So perhaps this is an experimental piece of his, not intended for museum-level veneration so not worth the expense of richly colored material or worthy of his imprimatur. Or maybe it’s one of those groaning copies by a student (“from the school of Raphael“ is probably the worst buzz-kill a wealthy collector can hear).
      I can only offer ambivalence—this is neither an ephemeral “sketch” nor a dazzling rarity. But it’s a mid-century artifact quite representative of the pioneer years of art-glass in America. Importantly, there are still authenticated Fritz works scattered in private hands, so acquiring one or two of those would bolster your own seriousness in the regard of markets and consignment firms. Don’t forget, wrapping a “probable” Leonardo in 15th-century bling and the glow of proximity with many verified Renaissance masters produced a handsome outcome for a lot of people. Undeservedly for them, in my estimation, but exactly what a spoiled-prince who murders journalists deserves.

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.