Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Odd Shaped Cabinet Card

In Photographs > Cabinet Card Photographs > Show & Tell.
Cabinet Card Photographs195 of 412Wild West Side Show Native American Signed CDVsCabinet card of Man with Family and his Banjo
Love it
Like it

rniedermanrniederman loves this.
SEAN68SEAN68 loves this.
walksoftlywalksoftly loves this.
vetraio50vetraio50 loves this.
See 2 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.

    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate

    Posted 7 years ago

    (136 items)

    This is the standard width of a cabinet card, however it's SUPER tall. The only reason I bought it is because I've never seen such an awkward shaped photo.
    Is this shape/size common?

    Any input is welcome and appreciated!

    Also... on the back is written: "Uncle John Brehler died in 1895"
    *was able to find him in the Michigan Death Index. Died Apr 12 1895 at the age of 29, single and no children. Mount Clemens, MI.

    Cabinet Card Photographs
    See all
    1888 N173 Old Judge Cabinets Set Break King Kelly Bat Ready 45 Degree PSA 3 VG
    1888 N173 Old Judge Cabinets Set Br...
    19thc CIRCUS SIDESHOW Barnum Freak ...
    Gettysburg Battlefield Cannonball in Tree Civil War Mumper Boudoir Cabinet Photo
    Gettysburg Battlefield Cannonball i...
    c.1900 Native American Indian Cabinet Card Photo Plateau Man Dr. Edward Latham
    c.1900 Native American Indian Cabin...
    1888 N173 Old Judge Cabinets Set Break King Kelly Bat Ready 45 Degree PSA 3 VG
    1888 N173 Old Judge Cabinets Set Br...
    See all


    1. scottvez scottvez, 7 years ago
      It is not that common. Most cabinet cards are 4 1/4 X 6 1/2 or very close to that size.

      It is probably a failed case of a photographer wanting to stand out from his competition. In your example-- the photograph adds nothing but extra "sky" above the subjects head. Additionally, this extra long size wouldn't fit in any of the standard albums of the era.

    2. antiquesareamazing antiquesareamazing, 7 years ago
      Thanks, Scott! Super helpful.
    3. scottvez scottvez, 7 years ago
      Glad to help.

      The style is more suited to a large group photographs. The corresponding camera MAY have been sold for that purpose-- rob may be able to shed some light on that possibility.

    4. rniederman rniederman, 7 years ago
      Hi all ... I too have a portrait in this odd format size. Mine is a dated 1882 image made by the famous Brooklyn photographer Frank Pearsall - I'll post it later. Scott is right, it's a rather unusual size yet the image in my collection takes advantage of this taller format by filling it with a full standing portrait (not just a head & shoulders vanity shot). However there is still some “sky” as Scott points out.

      The oval shape around the portrait was made by a vignette mask ... this can be done in camera or while printing. Although there is a lot of "sky", it gives some leeway if the portrait is framed.

      As far as studio equipment, it was probably shot with an 8x10 multiplying camera (single lens / shifting back style) set up to economically make two vertical images on a single plate - which would account for the odd size. The shifting back allows a photographer to separately exposure different parts of a plate. It was a very cost effective practice.

      Otherwise, it is possible the portrait was shot on a smaller 5x8 view camera, but most studios of the era typically had 8x10 and up. And yes, 5x8 (even trimmed a little) is a terrific format for groups.
    5. scottvez scottvez, 7 years ago
      Good point with the full standing views rob. I have several images that are 3/4 or full standing where this odd size was used.


    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.