Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Meiping vase marked Ming but I doubt it

In Asian > Chinese Pottery > Show & Tell and Pottery > Show & Tell.
Chinese Pottery514 of 577Unknown Chinese Lion Face? 19th Century? Chinese vase
4
Love it
0
Like it

chen50chen50 loves this.
ho2cultchaho2cultcha loves this.
LovelyPatLovelyPat loves this.
auraaura loves this.
See 2 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 10 years ago

    Offcenter
    (1 item)

    From an estate sale in Houston. No information available. Marked Ming, Wanli reign but I know that doesn't mean it's so. About a foot tall. A free oral appraisal put the value at about $3,000 three or four years ago. Later another guy said it was worth less than $200. Anybody got any ideas. I haven't found another one like it anywhere. I'd call it nice pottery not porcelain. I mainly want to know its approximate age and where it was made. Would appreciate any help I can get.

    Unsolved Mystery

    Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.

    logo
    Chinese Pottery
    See all
    EARLY LARGE CHINESE LONGQUAN CELADON GLAZED TRIPOD CENSER BOWL MING DYNASTY
    EARLY LARGE CHINESE LONGQUAN CELADO...
    $228
    Retro Antique Like Style Blue and White Porcelain Dragon Ceramic Covered Jar ...
    Retro Antique Like Style Blue and W...
    $39
    RARE EARLY KOREAN WHITE QINGBAI GLAZED MOON JAR VASE CHOSON JOSEON DYNASTY
    RARE EARLY KOREAN WHITE QINGBAI GLA...
    $112
    FINE CHINESE LONGQUAN CELADON CRACKLE GLAZED SCHOLARS TRIPOD CENSER SONG DYNASTY
    FINE CHINESE LONGQUAN CELADON CRACK...
    $20
    logo
    EARLY LARGE CHINESE LONGQUAN CELADON GLAZED TRIPOD CENSER BOWL MING DYNASTY
    EARLY LARGE CHINESE LONGQUAN CELADO...
    $228
    See all

    Comments

    1. apostata apostata, 5 years ago
      actually i thought i could read chinese , well thats that seems to be megalomany of mine apparently , because this is hard to read ,

      a sort of Chongzhen 1628-1643 ( long shot ) even when it might be real , i think there is almost no market for this , i don,t think it is much value
    2. apostata apostata, 1 year ago
      they stilized it wrong , it is ineed wanli, i ran the bottom and the sedimentation is is total bogus

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.