Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Is this a milk can tag?

In Bottles > Milk Cans > Show & Tell.
MMNJ's loves77 of 106Medicinal Blue Ribbon Bottled In Bond Whiskey Dovetail Wooden 1927 Prohibition CrateIn search of daughter's favorite mug, for a holiday surprise!
7
Love it
0
Like it

rancherswiferancherswife loves this.
MMNJMMNJ loves this.
PhonoboyPhonoboy loves this.
dav2no1dav2no1 loves this.
fortapachefortapache loves this.
NewfldNewfld loves this.
AnythingObscureAnythingObscure loves this.
See 5 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 2 years ago

    Paul.in.NJ
    (1 item)

    My historical society has been excavating bottles & other relics from a midden trash deposit dating to the late 1800s. This thin, oval copper tag was unearthed yesterday badly oxidized. Happily, I was able to successfully clean it.

    It reads:

    A.L. Hatch & Cos
    Pat'd May 28 1861
    Reissued March 5 1872
    594 Greenwich. St. N.Y.

    There is almost no information available online about this company. An 1883 New York City business directory notes that Almon L. Hatch made milk cans. That's it! I have been rather unsuccessful in searching the US Patent Office online records as well. I'm guessing this tag once graced one of the badly-degraded 10-gallon milk cans we have unearthed.

    Might anyone know anything about this obscure company?

    Unsolved Mystery

    Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.

    logo
    Milk Cans
    See all
    ANTIQUE STONEWARE POTTERY BUTTER CROCK 6 CENT BOTH SIDES RED WING ? ADVERTISING
    ANTIQUE STONEWARE POTTERY BUTTER CR...
    $59
    VTG ANTIQUE METAL MILK/CREAM CAN W CARRY HANDLE COUNTRY RUSTIC FARM SHABBY CHIC
    VTG ANTIQUE METAL MILK/CREAM CAN W ...
    $26
    VINTAGE 10 GALLON STEEL MILK CAN - 1930s - 1940s
    VINTAGE 10 GALLON STEEL MILK CAN - ...
    $75
    vintage copper milk can 4 quart
    vintage copper milk can 4 quart...
    $92
    logo
    ANTIQUE STONEWARE POTTERY BUTTER CROCK 6 CENT BOTH SIDES RED WING ? ADVERTISING
    ANTIQUE STONEWARE POTTERY BUTTER CR...
    $59
    See all

    Comments

    1. MMNJ MMNJ, 2 years ago
      Hatch & Co. started in the dairy supply business in 1843, and in 1909 it was incorporated into the Wisner Manufacturing Company (“Everything for Dairymen Always in Stock,” “Peerless Creamery Equipment”). Dairy was very big business on Greenwich St. during that time, with the Butter and Cheese Exchange of New York opening there in 1872 (later that grew into the New York Mercantile Exchange, today’s NYMEX).
    2. Paul.in.NJ, 2 years ago
      Wow! Thank you. We'll be adding this tag to our midden finds collection for display at a local school, and it's great to have some context for it.
    3. Phonoboy Phonoboy, 2 years ago
      How big is it it? It reminds me of smashed pennies, could it have been made from a penny?
    4. Paul.in.NJ, 2 years ago
      The tag is in fact copper. It measures 1 3/4" by 3" and is wafer-thin. There are no mounting holes, which kills my conjecture that it graced a milk can. Maybe the tag was glued to something made of wood, or leather(?), which has long since decomposed.

      I think the reason it survived intact is that the crud layer was thicker than the tag!
    5. MMNJ MMNJ, 2 years ago
      From image searches of antique milk cans, it seems a lot of tags were welded on, so there are no perforations for mounting.
    6. Paul.in.NJ, 2 years ago
      Yes, that sounds plausible. There was a lot of junk, including iron hoops, in the same vicinity. That might have been the remains of a milk can.

      I discovered that US patent number 00032439 was issued on May 28, 1861 to Philip Teets of New York City for his "Improved Milk-Can." His connection with the A.L. Hatch company seems clear -- the address Mr. Teets lists his address is the same as on the tag: 394 Greenwich St in New York City. I surmise he was employed there, and as such his invention would become the property of his employer.

    7. MMNJ MMNJ, 2 years ago
      That seems like a correct assumption. Hatch was the assignee of Teets’ patent: https://patents.google.com/patent/USRE4781E/en

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.