Posted 6 years ago
Ivonne
(186 items)
I always hesitate while writing a title for a CW post,because usually my doubts prevail over my certainty.I was examining this bowl very carefully before buying and hoped to see more details when it is in my hands but the photos were really good and I couldn't find more details to say if it was made by Kralik or not.My first thought was Kralik's bacillus but enormously 'fat'.Then I lost my confidence in favour of Rindskopf and finally stayed completely confused.
The glass is magenta colour with gold (?)flakes and covered with a strong irisation of purple and emerald.It's quite heavy and thick glass.
If anybody has a different opinion on it I will be deeply grateful for sharing.
BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!
Thank you ,jscott0363 for the coment and the love:)
I don't know who made this either but I can identify with the confusion.
Thank you,artfoot,for your comment.If you can,please...
Amazing colors! Beautiful bowl.
Sorry Ivonne, I can't help with identifying this, but it sure is beautiful! :^)
Gorgeous.....but I can't help either.
Love the gorgeous purple & green blended colors, beautiful bowl
Ivonne, i am quite confident to say Rindskopf's for this bowl.
Remind me the top part of one of my Rindskopf's cookie jar.
https://www.collectorsweekly.com/stories/171903-rindkopf-art-nouveau-biscuit-jar-circa
Beautiful piece, How big is it ?
Thank you for all the comments:
Anik,yes it is impressive and in a perfect condition
billretirecoll,it was sold as Loetz but where I live everything what shines is Loetz:)
sklo,appparently this piece isn't easy to id what makes me feel better:)
Newfld,the colours are so intensive like on carnival glass
Alan,in fact there are similarities so I'm topping the title up !
The bowl is about 7 cm tall and 14cm diameter
lovely shape
This is a lovely bowl! I believe it is by Kralik, and the decor is kind of in between their their pampas and bacillus decors (which both varied quite widely), and not Rindskopf. You can see this most clearly in last image, where you can see the more linear shapes of the glossy decoration against the overall matte surface of the bowl. Also, Kralik quite often used shapes with pushed out projections to them, as can be seen in the rounded shapes around this piece, whereas Rindskopf typically did not.
(I wanted to add that some examples of Kralik's pampas decor do have very wide banding, while others are much narrower, so to me, this does fall within that range.)
Thank you,kivatinitz for the nice comment:)
Michelleboo7,your explanations and comparing pampas and bacillus decors confirm my guessing .I couldn't find anythingg similar in the net and I haven't seen enough pieces to come to the conclusion.Your comment is very helpful.Thx.
Ivonne, you are from Poland? please write to me if you can :)
i would tend to go with michelle,s knowledge & experience a truly spectacular piece of glass
super good on you ivonne !!!!!!!!
Thanks,MALKEY!!!
Yes,I am,evetka,but how I can write to you?Don't know your e-mail :(
Thank you very much for all the loves:)