larksel » collections




Larksel has not created any collections yet. What are collections?


Prague, Czech Republic

I collect Bohemian glass, especially the period 1840 - 1940 (Loetz, Moser, Harrach, Kralik, Pallme Koenig, Rindskopf, Riedel ....). My entire collection is presentedI collect Bohemian glass, especially the period 1840 - 1940 (Loetz, Moser, Harrach, Kralik, Pallme Koenig, Rindskopf, Riedel ....). My entire collection is presented on my website (Read more)


See all 16
Loetz or Harrach bowl "Martelé geflecht mit Altsilber" - Art Glassin Art Glass
Loetz Combination - Diaspora, Tricolor, Chiné - Art Glassin Art Glass
Candia Diaspora and Rosa Orbulin PN 2/690, ca 1902 - Art Glassin Art Glass
Loetz Metallgelb PG 358 - Art Glassin Art Glass
Loetz Candia Martelé Ausführung 36 - Art Glassin Art Glass
Loetz Vulkan and Luna PN 85/3985 - Art Glassin Art Glass
Merry Christmas & Happy New Year - Art Glassin Art Glass
Loetz Ausführung 135 (???) - Art Glassin Art Glass
Loetz Rubin Matt Iris - DEK 719 (?) - Art Glassin Art Glass
Loetz Olympia Ausführung 154 - Art Glassin Art Glass


  1. I think it is a product of some Czech glassworks from the 60s - 70s of the 20th century. I have the same vase in a slightly different color design in my collection.
  2. Beautiful. Congratulations.
  3. It is probably the shape of Heckert, but it is very similar to the shapes of Kralik. Maybe it was a contract for manufacturers of metal mountings. See: ...
  4. Decor should be Heckert (Zelasko, PGM), but the shape seems to me rather Kralik. So Heckert or Kralik.
  5. Beautiful piece. I think it's "Granat" around 1905.
  6. Yes. I think it's Goldiris. On my site, I called it Candia Diaspora Silberiris (Gold).
  7. An admirable meritorious work. Congratulations.
  8. Deb, thank you very much for helping to identify PN of this bowl.
  9. On Alfredo Villanueva's website the vase with this decoration is presented as Loetz Nautilus. (vase on the right - it is the same vase that is in PGM at Harrach exhibition). see:
  10. So, between my photos from PGM, I found also Creta Diaspora of the same shape. (added to my site) Obviously, this is not an unusual shape. In addition to the PN II-2055 (ca 82 mm, 1905) I still foun...
  11. Dr. Jitka Lnenickova, in the introduction to her book, states: "They are a natural leeway between the measurements of patterns and actual items ranging from one to ten millimeters."
  12. It is true. The shape is the same, but the size is different. For PN-2055, the height is about 82 mm in the description. However, I believe that the shape was made in several sizes (as in many other c...
  13. For a long time I could not find the corresponding PN. From my PGM photos from 2012, I found the same shapes in Metalgelb Cytisus and Creta Ciselé. But today I found Paper Patern on CW Warren's post f...
  14. Beautiful piece. Congratulation. The same "deckeldose" is exhibited at the Museum Sumavy in Kasperske Hory.
  15. I again reviewed my PGM photo from 2012. I did not find anything like this at Kralik part. Only at Harrach are 2 identical vases with the same Decor. But there are transfers between expositions of ind...
  16. Beautiful. The middle vase on the 3rd photo looks like a combination of Formosa and Mimosa.
  17. Beautiful vase. This is not Astralith (Goldglas)? "Mergl" book picture no. 295? I think I have a similar vase - see:
  18. Foot connection is analyzed at Early Loetz production 1880 - 1897 by Dr. Kai Hasselbach - Examples 64.01-64.10. Here, however, it is stated that, in addition to Loetz, Harrach's glassworks w...
  19. Of course, it can also be Kralik. This seems more likely to me than Harrach.
  20. Very interesting. Link to my Loetz for A.Rupp:
  21. Correction. Both vases are probably new Orbulin. I mistook shape. Sorry.
  22. Beautiful. But I think the second photo is only the smaller vase of the new orbulin. Interesting is photo 3. What is this source?
  23. Beautiful. Congratulations.
  24. That's amazing. Of my 13 diaspora I have only 1 moved to Orbulin (also pink).
  25. Jericho, thank you very much for the sent photos. I have already included my vase - bowl was repaired at Kralik - decor "Cluthra".
  26. An amazing collection. Congratulations. I'm still attracted by the last 2 vases on the 4th photo. In the literature, both versions are assigned to the PG 358. I think the decoration in the middle diff...
  27. Very interesting. I have a similar vase in my collection. I bought it as a bohemian glass - maybe Loetz around 1930. Finally I ranked it as a product of Kosta Boda - perhaps a design by Bertil Valien ...
  28. Beautiful piece from W. Kralik. In my collection I have the same décor in a different color and design. see:
  29. I think it's Harrach's production. In my collection, I have a vase of the same shape and painting in a different color design. see:
  30. Beautiful vase of Loetz. I think it is signed "Ficher" (used quite exceptionally for the French market). see:
  31. In my collection, I have classified this decor as unidentified (I have called it "Neu Carneol"). Thanks to your post, I made an adjustment to Kaiserrot mit schwarz marmoriert and I also found PN. see...
  32. It could be Kralik, but I'm not sure. In my collection I have been classified as an unidentified bohemian production. (see my website:
  33. Beautiful piece. Congratulations.
  34. Beautiful piece. Congratulations.
  35. Yes, I would say Norma with white spots.
  36. Thank you Sammyz. This plant is very rare also in the Czech Republic. At present it is designated as an endangered species.
  37. This is Loetz Rusisch Grün Glatt, PN II-369 (shape for Paris World Exhibiton 1900), shape and design maybe Franz Hofstötter, DEK - unidentified - perhaps for Wiener Winteraustellung 1900/1901, size 2...
  38. one more link:
  39. Beautiful vase. I think it could be Poschinger, Buchenau. ???
  40. That's amazing. Another piece into the Loetz mosaic. Congratulations.
  41. I just discovered the same vase in the catalog of the 60th Auction Wolfgang Ketterer München (1982) - lot 127.
  42. Yes, the left handle seems a little different. But it seems to be a manufacturing mistake. The handles were originally partly gildet. I do not think this is a restored handle.
  43. Same Decor in another color: Brohan, p. 107, item 123, and 60. Aktion Wolfgang Ketterer München 20 November 1982 - Item 132.
  44. Beautiful piece. Congratulations.
  45. A beautiful piece. Congratulations. link to my 2 pieces in the same decor (I have listed as Heckert with a note that some sources refer as producer Pallme Koenig or Kralik). http://www.bohemianglass...
  46. Congratulations, it is admirable such an item on ebay to find.
  47. In my opinion, one of the most beautiful Pallme Koenig Decor. For comparison, another "Halequin - var.":
  48. Very nice. Group photo is awesome.
  49. Beautiful.
  50. Beautiful. Congratulations.
  51. See more